Eritrea: Small Country, Big Needs

Eritrea: Small Country, Big Needs
.

Washington File

Washington -- Even though Eritrea has a small population, its vital food security needs are not escaping the notice of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), says Lauren Landis, Director of the USAID Office of Food for Peace.

"Not only is Eritrea not falling off our radar screen, but we are watching the screen very closely," said Landis, who oversees more than $1,500 million in food aid to over 100 countries. She was speaking to the Washington File only two weeks before President Bush makes his first trip to Africa July 7-12.

On June 26, USAID announced an additional 26,000 metric tons in food assistance, worth $10.6 million, was being sent to Eritrea.

Landis said this close attention is possible through a USAID-funded service called the Famine Early Warning Systems (FEWS) network that monitors and reports on food insecurity conditions in 18 countries in Africa.

Eritrea appeared in the "Urgent Action Required" section of the June 15 FEWS weekly overview, which reported: "Serious and widespread food insecurity [in Eritrea] persists despite emergency relief operations. Below average and patchy azmera rains in April-May negatively affected planting and germination of long-cycle crops, which critically depend on good performance of the Kremti rains between June and August."

"FEWS gives us these alerts and tells us how each set of rains is going," said Landis. "We are among the first to know what might be happening and what we need to do in terms of assistance."

USAID has contributed 144,680 metric tons of food aid to the drought-affected Eritrean population in 2003, which is about half the total food aid the World Food Program estimates the country will need. More than 1.4 million of the countrys 4 million people need relief from the impact of the drought.

Landis was positive about assistance to the small African country. "The really good thing about Eritrea is that you sense that things really work. When you send in a metric ton of food aid, you do not fear that metric ton will be pilfered and lost," she said. "There is also a really good sense that the Eritrean people do not really want to be on food aid. They will tell you, ‘We need it now, but we dont want food aid. We want to take care of ourselves."

The Food for Peace director also noted some of Eritreas advantages compared to other African countries. "Markets work a lot better in Eritrea than they do in Ethiopia. Thats really critical."

In a trip to Eritrea and Ethiopia last October, Landis noticed that the children in Eritrea appear to be suffering less than their counterparts across the border. "However they have done it, they have been able to keep the population more together, maintaining a few more assets and keeping the children from getting so malnourished," she said.

Eritrea does have policies that could be improved, according to Landis, including its requirement of universal military service. "The problem is that the military service takes a lot of productive assets away from building the economy and from building food security," she said. She also mentioned the waste of resources resulting from the war with Ethiopia.

Overall, Landis was optimistic about the future food security situation in Eritrea. "We strongly believe that we wont be delivering food aid to Eritrea for the next 20 years," she stated. "Theyre on the right track. We want to help them out when they need assistance, but we feel that the will is there to make their population food secure."

(The Washington File is a product of the Bureau of International Information Programs, U.S. Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)

This site is produced and maintained by the U.S. Department of States Office of International Information Programs (usinfo.state.gov). Links to other Internet sites should not be construed as an endorsement of the views contained therein.

.